EPA Says Not So Fast
The EPA has delayed a decision as to whether it should regulate carbon dioxide and other greenhouse emissions, saying that it should not be rushed into a hasty decision regardless of what the Supreme Court says.
Predictably, Democrats were outraged. The most ironic response comes from Barbara Boxer (D-CA): "Time is not on our side when it comes to avoiding dangerous climate change." Ok, the planet has been around for eons, the temperature may have risen 1/2 degree over the past 100 years and yet we are supposed to think that any delayed action for a few months (or even years) is supposed to be the doom of us all?
I guess the only downside of the EPA not regulating carbon dioxide emissions is that there is no limit on the hot air that Congressional Democrats can spew.
Predictably, Democrats were outraged. The most ironic response comes from Barbara Boxer (D-CA): "Time is not on our side when it comes to avoiding dangerous climate change." Ok, the planet has been around for eons, the temperature may have risen 1/2 degree over the past 100 years and yet we are supposed to think that any delayed action for a few months (or even years) is supposed to be the doom of us all?
I guess the only downside of the EPA not regulating carbon dioxide emissions is that there is no limit on the hot air that Congressional Democrats can spew.
<< HOME