FBI Sees No Difference Between Crime and Terrorism

This article from the Washington Post today is disturbing. The FBI still doesn't seem to understand or care about the differences between a regular criminal attack and a terrorist attack:

In hundreds of pages of sworn testimony obtained by The Associated Press, senior FBI managers argued repeatedly that Middle East and anti-terrorism experience aren't required for promotion and that they see little difference between solving a traditional crime and a terror attack.

"A bombing case is a bombing case," said Dale Watson, the FBI's terrorism chief in the two years after Sept. 11, 2001. "A crime scene in a bank robbery case is the same as a crime scene, you know, across the board."

The FBI is still a disfunctional organization and the culture needs to change. It seems to me that terrorism experience would be pretty handy in solving a terror attack, but then again, I'm not in the FBI.