Bielat Comes Up Short
Sean Bielat fought valiantly but came up short. I guess it was always going to be an uphill battle in a district where you have 75% democrats, but he still made it fairly close: 54% to 43%. In analyzing the result, Frank had 38% fewer votes than he did in 2008 - this was expected. Bielat also had 35% more than the Republican challenger in 2008. While 35% is a big jump from 2008, I thought he would get much more considering the profile of the race. Just seems like the Republicans didn't come out to vote - either that or in this district, there just aren't any republicans, which is also probably true. But still a strong effort in a near-impossible democratic-engineered district, especially considering Bielat is actually closer to a libertarian than a republican.
It actually looks like Bielat did great on a town by town basis, as he took 28 of 39 towns and was competitive in almost all of them except for 3: Newton, Brookline, and New Bedford. In these 3 towns, Bielat got 33,000 fewer votes than Frank (overall he lost by 24,000 votes).
Oh well. Rome wasn't built in a day. Gerry-mandered strongholds take a long time to dismantle. I'd love to see Bielat build upon his experience by running again in two years or even going after Senator Kerry next time.
It actually looks like Bielat did great on a town by town basis, as he took 28 of 39 towns and was competitive in almost all of them except for 3: Newton, Brookline, and New Bedford. In these 3 towns, Bielat got 33,000 fewer votes than Frank (overall he lost by 24,000 votes).
Oh well. Rome wasn't built in a day. Gerry-mandered strongholds take a long time to dismantle. I'd love to see Bielat build upon his experience by running again in two years or even going after Senator Kerry next time.
<< HOME